Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
CahokiaA World Renewal Cult Heterarchy$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

A. Martin Byers

Print publication date: 2006

Print ISBN-13: 9780813029580

Published to Florida Scholarship Online: September 2011

DOI: 10.5744/florida/9780813029580.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM FLORIDA SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.florida.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University Press of Florida, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in FLASO for personal use (for details see http://www.florida.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 14 December 2017

Mound 72

Mound 72

Funerary Monument or World Renewal Icon?

Chapter:
(p.325) 13 Mound 72
Source:
Cahokia
Author(s):

A. Martin Byers

Publisher:
University Press of Florida
DOI:10.5744/florida/9780813029580.003.0013

This chapter provides a description of the mound and its associated material features and contents, a summary description of its larger context (Woodhenge 72), and a critique of the hierarchical account of this major feature. The chapter first discusses the most relevant components and associations of Mound 72. This is followed by the hierarchical monistic modular polity interpretation, which, of course, takes a strong funerary perspective with regard to the mortuary data and a symbolic referential perspective with regard to the monumental aspect of this mound and its archaeological context—in particular, what Melvin Fowler refers to as Woodhenge 72. Following a critique of the funerary and symbolic referential interpretations of these mortuary data and their immediate material context, the chapter reinterprets the same data in the framework of the Mourning/World Renewal Mortuary model and the symbolic pragmatic perspective. When Woodhenge 72 and its associated feature, Mound 72, are in total shown to be interpreted more coherently in these rather than the former terms, the World Renewal Cult Heterarchy model is strongly supported. The polyistic locale-centric heterarchical account explains both the monumental and mortuary data within an integrated theoretical framework.

Keywords:   Mound 72, Melvin Fowler, Woodhenge 72, Mourning/World Renewal Mortuary model, World Renewal Cult Heterarchy model, polyistic locale-centric heterarchical account

Florida Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .